Skip to main content

2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited review

Updated review of the 2014 model year to include changes to the 2015 model year

2014 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport front left
2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
MSRP $22.00
“For off-roading enthusiasts, there is no other car in showrooms that can beat the Wrangler. As daily driver, family wagon, though, it leaves much to be desired – especially for the price.”
Pros
  • Off-road capability
  • Blocky, masculine bodylines
  • Improved V6 power
  • Quiet interior
Cons
  • Difficult to keep it in a straight line
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Feels cheap

Update 11-19-14: This review originally covered the 2014 model year of the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited. The 2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited is in showrooms now. No substantial changes were made to the body or design of the car, but the latest model showcases a few interior updates and additional package offerings. All changes are listed below.

  • All-new eight speaker audio system with improved sound bar is standard
  • All-new nine-speaker Premium Alpine audio system with amplifier and subwoofer is available
  • New standard Torx Tool Kit for removing the top, doors and bumper end caps included on all models
  • New Black Steel and 31-inch Dueler Tire Package available on Wrangler Sport models includes 16-inch Low Gloss Black steel wheels and Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo2 tires
  • Wrangler Rubicon Hard Rock special edition improves off-road capability with special features and a new unique look
  • Freedom and Willys Wheeler Editions return for 2015
Recommended Videos

Intro

The Jeep Wrangler is one of those iconic American cars, on par with the Mustang and the Corvette, that anyone on the planet can look at and immediately recognize and appreciate.

There’s no debating that the Wrangler is one of the best out-of-the-box off-roaders at any price.

The Wrangler’s lineage stretches back into World War II as an unbeatable 4×4 runabout. And, while the world has changed greatly since the 1940s, the Wrangler has carried the prestige of its predecessors. It marries newfangled high-tech electronics with old-world mechanical machismo.

There’s no debating that the Wrangler is one of the best out-of-the-box off-roaders at any price. What if you’re buying a Wrangler not as a weekend toy but as a daily driver you also take out on to the trails? What’s it like then?

It’s a very strange beast indeed.

Under the knobby hood

A few years ago, Jeep re-worked the Wrangler a bit and bolted the Chrysler family’s 285-horsepower, 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 under the hood and upgraded from a four-speed automatic to a five-speed. This made the Wrangler much more powerful, livable, and it was also supposed to make it more fuel efficient.

The EPA rates the Wrangler Unlimited at 16 mpg city, 20 highway, with a combined score of 18 mpg. During my time with it, I averaged 15 mpg. I drove it in 2×4 most of the time and in mixed city and highway driving.

In cars like the Chrysler 300, the Pentastar V6 is an impressive powerhouse. Under the skin of the Wrangler, it’s not quite as awe-inspiring. But I’ll admit it’s a sight better than the minivan motor that used to power the Wrangler. Over all, it’s a win.

The biggest improvement lies with the five-speed automatic. I wish Jeep had bolted up its eight-speed auto to the Wrangler. I suspect that – and a diesel powerplant – will be offered in the next-gen.

Doors on or off?

I am a big fan of both boxy cars and 4×4 off-roaders. So the Wrangler fires on several cylinders for me. I think – in its four-door ‘Unlimited’ form – it’s one of the best-looking SUV truck 4×4 thingies on the market. Only the Mercedes G-Class comes close.

Step inside, though, and my admiration dwindles a bit.

Spend much more than a few minutes in a pre mid-2000s Jeep and you, too, would be ready to be sent home to Jesus.

Jeep interiors, like the rest of the Chrysler family, used to be absolutely dreary. Draped in thin, crappy grey plastic, Jeep interiors left occupants with the feeling of being in a death-row holding cell. Spend much more than a few minutes in a pre mid-2000s Jeep and you, too, would be ready to be sent home to Jesus.

Since Chrysler went belly up, got bailed out, and was purchased by Italian auto giant Fiat, Jeep interiors have improved exponentially. The Jeep Grand Cherokee, for example, is a wondrous place to be, with natural wood and leather throughout.

The interior reimagining has trickled down to the Wrangler too. Unlike the Grand Cherokee, Jeep has left the Wrangler much more utilitarian. The dash looks better and the bits fit together much better than they did in every previous generation. But, unlike the Grand Cherokee, things still feel cheap. The instrumentation is still done in the classic American 1980s blue-green lighting. Even the Wrangler’s Uconnect, which is a huge step forward, isn’t very great.

Where the Wrangler separates itself from the rest of the SUV market – aside from it’s trail-taming abilities – is with its ability to shed its doors and roof. Heck, you can still even fold the windshield down onto the hood, though I don’t know why you’d ever do that. Bugs and wind striking your face at over 20 mph hurt a lot.

2014 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport front macro
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Despite its removable bits and low-rent interior, the Wrangler is shockingly quiet on the road. I don’t mean just quiet for a Wrangler but quiet by the entire automotive industry. I’ve been in much louder BMWs, for example.

On the road

The two-door Wrangler bobs and weaves down the road, as the front and rear wheels are so close together that its big mud tires allow it to meander. Having the Unlimited four-door model evens that out a bit, pulling the front away from the rear by a few inches. It doesn’t by any means solve the problem, though.

Since the Wrangler is built for extreme off-roading, the ride quality is shockingly good. It suffers body roll a bit in the corners, but not as bad as you might think, especially given the lack of refinement of the entire package. Hit a bump, though, and the big tires and skillful suspension soak it up with ease. It is a remarkably comfortable ride … in a straight line. If you can get it into one.

Pull over and let’s think about this

I took my best friend Peter around in the Wrangler and, while we had fun, Peter concluded that the Wrangler was unacceptably cheap.

“How much does this thing cost?” He asked.

“As it sits, $36,050.”

“That’s way too much.” He chuckled.

“Yes but this Unlimited Sport starts at $26,195.” I replied.

“My God! What does the extra $10,000 buy you?”

“Aside from a few small things, mostly it’s the automatic transmission and the black wheel package.” I said, studying the window sticker.

Peter was on to something, something I had overlooked while feeling extremely masculine as I cruised around town in a bright red 4×4: The Wrangler is actually a very bad car by 2014 standards, especially for the money.

I had been caught up in its bossy looks, its quiet interior, smooth ride, and its ability to – at a moment’s notice – shed its skin and head for the hills.

Granted, I didn’t partake in any of that 4×4, door-less adventuring. In my mind, though, knowing I could was all I needed to get romantic and wistful behind the wheel of the Wrangler.

Shocked back to reality, I, too, was a bit horrified with the thing. That doesn’t mean it’s a wash. I still recommend the Wrangler for those who want a showroom fresh 4×4. You honestly can’t beat it for the money.

If you’re going to get one, though, get the most basic model you can. The few upgrades Jeep offers are wildly overpriced and don’t add to refinement or safety whatsoever. So I say skip them. Get the $27,000 Unlimited and pretend that every day is a safari. Otherwise, you might as well spend an extra $2,000 and get a Mercedes CLA. You know, a car your friends and family won’t be embarrassed to be seen in with more than a modicum of safety and refinement.

Highs

  • Off-road capability
  • Blocky, masculine bodylines
  • Improved V6 power
  • Quiet interior

Lows

  • Difficult to keep it in a straight line
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Feels cheap
Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra forge a new path for EVs
Scout Traveler and Scout Terra.

Electric vehicles are inseparable from newness, whether it’s new tech, new designs, or new companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Tesla. But the Volkswagen Group’s new EV-only brand also relies heavily on the past.

Unveiled Thursday, the Scout Traveler electric SUV and Scout Terra electric pickup truck are modern interpretations of the classic International Harvester Scout. Manufactured from 1961 to 1980, the original Scout helped popularize the idea of the rugged, off-road-capable utility vehicle, setting the stage for modern SUVs.

Read more
Robotaxi aside, a $25,000 EV would be pointless, Tesla CEO says
Blue Tesla Model 3 Highland on the road

Enthusiasts expecting to one day put their hands on the steering wheel of a $25,000 Tesla EV may feel like they’ve been taken for a ride.
CEO Elon Musk has just put a serious damper on those expectations, saying that outside of the driverless Robotaxi recently unveiled by Tesla, a regular $25,000 model would be “pointless” and “silly.”
During a conference call with investors, Musk was asked to clarify whether such a model was in the works.
"Basically, having a regular $25K model is pointless,” Musk said. “It would be silly. It would be completely at odds with what we believe." Tesla, Musk continued, has “been very clear that the future is autonomous.”
On October 10, Tesla unveiled its much-awaited robotaxi, called the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The company also unveiled the Robovan, a much larger autonomous vehicle expected to carry people or goods.
The automaker said the Cybercab is expected to be produced in 2026 and cost $30,000. Musk, meanwhile, said that it would be a $25,000 car without specifying if that price tag included federal tax credits.
Tesla’s ambiguity about an affordable entry-level model has been going on for years. In 2020, Musk signaled that a $25,000 Tesla would arrive within three years. It was later reported that Tesla had ditched the idea, instead favoring the development of a robotaxi.
Language within Tesla’s latest financial report still hints that new affordable Tesla models are on the way. But Musk’s latest comments are putting a floor on just how affordable these would be. So far, Tesla’s Model 3 Rear-Wheel-Drive remains the company’s cheapest model, with a base price of $38,990.
Some rival EV makers, meanwhile, are entering the affordable space more aggressively in the U.S.
General Motors has already put out its Chevy Equinox EV at a price of $27,500, including federal tax credits. Volkswagen America says it plans to release an under-$35,000 EV in the U.S. by 2027.

Read more
Stellantis’ 2027 Dodge Charger Daytona might feature solid-state battery tech
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona sedan.

The battle to use cheaper, more efficient, and safer EV batteries is heating up among automakers. At the heart of this battle, the development of solid-state battery technology, an alternative to highly flammable and costly lithium batteries, is garnering more and more attention.For proof, Stellantis, the world’s fourth-largest automaker, is betting on the technology for its next generation of electric vehicles. The Netherlands-based company announced that it will launch a demonstration fleet of Dodge Charger Daytona EVs that will feature solid-state battery tech made by U.S. startup Factorial.The demo fleet, expected to launch by 2026, will provide a real-world assessment of Factorial’s technology. Factorial has been partnering with Stellantis since 2021 and is also partnering with the likes of Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Hyundai.Besides Dodge, the technology would eventually be deployed on the Stellantis STLA Large multi-energy platform, which includes brands such as Jeep, Chrysler, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati.Stellantis said that the integration of solid-state battery technology will yield “improved performance, longer driving ranges, and faster charging times in the coming years.”Factorial, meanwhile, says its technology provides higher energy density, reduced weight, improved performance, and the potential for further reduction in total vehicle cost over time. Stellantis, Daimler, and Hyundai aren’t the only ones to bet on solid-state battery tech. Toyota, the largest automaker in the world, has heavily invested in the technology. It also created a coalition with Nissan and Panasonic to boost its production in Japan. So far, making solid-state batteries has remained an expensive endeavor. But steps such as the Stellantis demo fleet and production at scale by the likes of Factorial are expected to improve manufacturing processes and costs over time.Other automakers, meanwhile, are working on ways to improve lithium batteries. Volkswagen, for one, is developing its own unified battery cell in several European plants as well as one plant in Ontario, Canada.

Read more